Friday, November 23, 2007

Contractors Balk at No-Heavy-Lifting Standard

Ergonomics regulations being considered again ...

"Construction companies, which won an exemption from a Clinton administration rule protecting workers from heavy lifting and other repetitive-motion injuries, are trying to kill off a new voluntary industry standard.

Five trade groups representing U.S. residential and commercial builders filed an appeal on Nov. 9 of an ergonomics measure adopted by the nonprofit American National Standards Institute, which uses safety professionals and labor and industry to develop rules. There is no penalty if employers ignore the standards.

``It strains credulity to assert that a voluntary consensus standard exists in the face of opposition by the construction industry employers,'' the appeal said. Some issues ``are so contentious they do not lend themselves to the development of consensus standards.''

The regulation of ergonomics -- the relationship of workers to their physical environment -- has been a decade-long battleground involving Congress, business, labor and government. The Labor Department said in 2001 that more than 600,000 workers a year had to take time off because of ergonomic-related injuries. Congress that year overturned a Clinton administration rule designed to prevent such injuries.

Since then, business groups have been vigilant in preventing most formal regulation at the state or federal level. Most of them don't support the voluntary ergonomic ``guidelines'' that the Bush administration's U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued covering poultry processing, grocery stores and nursing homes.

`Whatever They Can'

The five trade groups will ``do whatever they can to stop an ergonomics standard,'' said Frank Burg, a safety consultant who worked on the voluntary rule. ``We reached out to these people and put 90 percent of what they wanted in the standard.''

The American Society of Safety Engineers, a Des Plaines, Illinois trade group, oversaw the process that led to the institute's adoption of the rule on June 4. The appeal will be decided in February.

The issue carries more weight now because of the industry's concern that a Democrat might take the White House and resurrect an enforceable federal ergonomics standard. Almost all the Democratic presidential candidates are on record saying they support protecting workers from such injuries."    (Continued via    [Ergonomics Resources]

Lifting Standards- Ergonomics

Lifting Standards

Listen to this article


Post a Comment